When Ryan O'Dowd, executive producer of ABC stood in front of a Deadline reporter in September 2025, he didn't just shrug off the rumor mill – he flat‑out rejected it. "We have never, nor would we ever manipulate the votes," O'Dowd said, his tone as firm as a judge’s scorecard. The claim he was refuting? A growing chorus of fans who believe the long‑running dance competition, Season 34 of Dancing With The StarsLos Angeles, California, has been secretly tweaking the public’s voting power.
The tinder‑box ignited during Week 2, when the show yanked two couples off the floor in a single night. One of those couples was singer Lauren Jauregui, former member of Fifth Harmony. Even though the judges handed her an 18‑out‑of‑30 for her cha‑cha to "Work From Home," the audience‑vote tally sent her packing. Viewers in the studio gasped, and within minutes the Twitterverse exploded with #JusticeForLauren.
O'Dowd insisted the voting system is a “pure, unfiltered voice of the people.” He explained that votes are collected via phone, text, and the official app, then aggregated by an independent third‑party auditor. "The integrity of that data is verified before any results are announced," he added. While he didn’t spill the exact numbers, the producer noted that any attempt to tamper would trigger immediate alerts in the audit software – a safeguard he claims has never been breached.
After the announcement, host Alfonso Ribeiro, known for his charismatic sign‑off, delivered the news with his usual smile, but Jauregui’s reaction was unmistakable: "Pissed," she later told reporters. The moment was captured on Instagram Live, where millions watched the studio’s stunned silence. Within hours, the hashtag #DWTSRigged amassed over 1.2 million tweets, and fans organized a petition demanding a transparent vote recount.
Judge Carrie Ann Inaba responded to the uproar on her Instagram Stories, writing, "It’s okay to disagree about what we see. That’s what makes our show great. You have a say in the matter. ❤️" A source from Cosmopolitan noted that judges have been scoring tougher because "the competition is heating up and it really is tough this season with some strong contestants." The source also confirmed that contestant Dylan Efron has been tapped to lead the 2026 touring cast, but there’s "no plot for him to win"—the outcome still rests on viewer votes.
ABC’s internal analytics team flagged a 12 % dip in live‑viewing numbers for the double‑elim episode, while streaming re‑watch rates spiked by 27 %—a clear sign that people were either rewinding to catch details or sharing clips on TikTok. Network executives, who asked to remain unnamed, said they are "closely monitoring social media sentiment and voting patterns" and have convened a crisis‑communication meeting with O'Dowd and the show's legal counsel.
Industry experts suggest three likely paths: (1) ABC could announce a minor rule tweak – perhaps limiting double eliminations to later weeks; (2) the show might rollout a public audit report after the season finale; or (3) the controversy could simply fade as new dance numbers capture viewers' attention. Either way, the next episode’s voting window will be a litmus test for whether the audience’s anger dissipates or intensifies.
Dancing With The Stars has faced scrutiny before. In 2019, former host Tom Bergeron’s sudden departure led to speculation about backstage politics. In 2022, a TikTok‑night episode was criticized for favoring younger contestants in the app’s algorithmic promotion. The show also weathered backlash when former political figure Sean Spicer was paired with a celebrity partner, sparking accusations of politicizing the dance floor. Each time, the producers responded with a mix of transparency promises and format adjustments, a pattern that may repeat this season.
If viewers believe the vote can be tampered with, they may disengage, leading to lower participation rates. That, in turn, could influence producers to favor celebrity‑driven storylines over pure dance merit, potentially skewing future pairings and jeopardizing the show's credibility.
So far, the main evidence is social‑media data: sudden spikes in negative sentiment, leaked rehearsal footage that appears edited, and the surprising double‑elimination outcomes. No concrete forensic proof of vote tampering has surfaced, and the show's third‑party auditor maintains that the process is secure.
Producers could keep high‑profile celebrities on air longer, boosting ad revenue and streaming numbers. Conversely, contestants with strong dance backgrounds but smaller fan bases might be sidelined in favor of personalities who draw larger online followings.
ABC has issued a public statement reiterating confidence in the voting process and promised greater transparency after the season finale, including a potential release of anonymized voting data. They are also reviewing the double‑elimination format for future seasons.
Historical trends suggest short‑term dips after scandals, but DWTS has consistently rebounded thanks to its loyal fan base and high‑profile celebrity line‑up. Sustained distrust, however, could erode viewership if the network fails to demonstrate concrete reforms.
Welcome to Peaceful Bagel Journeys, your one-stop destination for unforgettable travel experiences and unique tourism insights. Dive into the world of adventure and exploration, while discovering hidden gems around the globe. Join us on this journey as we unveil the beauty of our planet, one peaceful bagel at a time.
Write a comment